To control your music or digital assistant, there’s a button on the underside of the right arm. Most people I showed the Frames to assumed there was a touch-sensitive panel on the arm. They’re wrong — there’s only the button. It offers basic controls: Press once to play, pause music or answer calls. Press twice to skip tracks and three times to go back, and hold down to trigger the voice assistant. The button feels a little sharp and is quite small so trying to double or triple click was sometimes tricky. I also wish there were volume controls on the device. I hated having to whip out my phone anytime I wanted to turn the volume up or down.
Changing the volume is something I did pretty often, too, given how easily the Frame’s speakers were overpowered by environmental noise. In a car or on New York streets, I usually set the device at 80 percent and can hear my Top 40 hits pretty well. But I have to set it to max on the train, and if we go through a tunnel or I walk past some construction on the streets, I basically can’t hear the music at all.
The good news is that in general I didn’t need to go as loud as 100 percent. The bad news is that when I did, people about an arm’s length away would start being able to hear the embarrassing recordings of my singing lessons that I was playing. This sound leakage doesn’t happen until you push the volume up past about 80 percent, though, and it happens with many other regular headphones too.
The Frames delivered decent-enough audio. But there was basically no bass, which made songs like Sam Smith’s “Dancing With a Stranger” far less enjoyable than on my earbuds. I found that devices like the AfterShokz Xtrainerz and Optishokz Revvez, which use bone conduction to amplify sound, were much louder and had stronger bass. But I didn’t care for the irritating way they vibrated. I also can’t wear the Xtrainerz properly, since they need to wrap around the back of your skull for a good fit. They’re designed for people who don’t have long, thick hair like I do.
The Bose Frames are especially great for someone like me, who hates earbuds, detests wires and doesn’t like the way over-ear headphones mess up my hair. But let’s be real, that’s a really niche and specific situation.
I also like that you can have hands-free phone conversations via the Frames, and all the people I spoke to with the eyewear said they heard me just fine.
The Frames only offer mediocre battery life though. It’s rated to endure about three hours of nonstop playback or 12 hours of standby. I could get through about two hours of music (with breaks in between) before needing a charge, but I was able to go days on standby without plugging the Frames in. That’s shorter than the four-hour runtime Sony promises for the Xperia and the six hours for the OptiShokz Revvez, but we haven’t had a chance to put those claims to the test yet. Most other true wireless buds last about three to five hours, which puts the Frames on the shorter end of the spectrum. Noise canceling and Bluetooth headphones generally last hours longer though.
Bose wants Frames to be more than just a hybrid headphone-sunglass device. The company is working on making the shades more useful by letting you respond to audio cues with head movements. For example, if Assistant asks whether you want to reply to an incoming message, you can just nod to confirm instead of having to reach up and tap a button. When this system rolls out in a few months, you’ll be able to do things like navigate through an audio menu by turning your head left or right, then selecting a choice by nodding.
Bose also plans to launch its audio-based AR ecosystem to make the Frames much more helpful. For instance, if you’re walking through a new neighborhood, it might alert you to popular restaurants and landmarks. It could also help you navigate to your destination by telling you when to take your next turn.
I checked out an early version of Bose’s audio-enriched world and gesture-based navigation at SXSW last year and was impressed by the promise of sound-based AR. And it had no problems recognizing when I nodded or shook my head.
Those two features could make the Frames more useful than your typical open-ear headphones. And all it’s waiting on is a firmware update. So those of you who’ve already bought them won’t need to spend more money. That’s good news, since these things aren’t cheap. At $200, though, its price is in line with similar headphones. The OptiShokz Revvez comes in at about the same price, for example, while the Sony Xperia Ear Duo costs $280.
As a debut effort, the Bose Frames are more than just a novelty — at least they actually work. But not well enough yet. Plus, you probably shouldn’t be wearing your sunglasses at night or at the gym (unless you’re super thick-skinned), which kind of limits their usefulness. Bose says it intends to make prescription lens or clear options available as well as implement the audio technology into other formats like bike or ski helmets. But for now, you’re better off just waiting for a second-generation model or the promised updates.